Our children will not know snow…

Back in 2000, the Global Warming nuts in England proudly proclaimed that the children in England will not know what snow was and that the times of Charles Dickens like White Christmases was over.

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls-are-now-just-a-thing-of-the-past-724017.html

Now today, 10 years later, England is facing its second massive snowy winter.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/weather/8169698/UK-snow-first-flakes-fall-on-London-as-Arctic-weather-spreads.html

AND

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/weather/8170360/UK-snow-roads-and-schools-closed-as-more-Arctic-weather-forecast.html

Anyone else see the irony?

Advertisements
Published in: on December 3, 2010 at 10:29 am  Comments (6)  
Tags: , , ,

Thorium: Why aren’t we using this?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/7970619/Obama-could-kill-fossil-fuels-overnight-with-a-nuclear-dash-for-thorium.html

“If Barack Obama were to marshal America’s vast scientific and strategic resources behind a new Manhattan Project, he might reasonably hope to reinvent the global energy landscape and sketch an end to our dependence on fossil fuels within three to five years. ”

“Dr Rubbia says a tonne of the silvery metal – named after the Norse god of thunder, who also gave us Thor’s day or Thursday – produces as much energy as 200 tonnes of uranium, or 3,500,000 tonnes of coal. A mere fistful would light London for a week.

Thorium eats its own hazardous waste. It can even scavenge the plutonium left by uranium reactors, acting as an eco-cleaner. “It’s the Big One,” said Kirk Sorensen, a former NASA rocket engineer and now chief nuclear technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering.

“Once you start looking more closely, it blows your mind away. You can run civilisation on thorium for hundreds of thousands of years, and it’s essentially free. You don’t have to deal with uranium cartels,” he said.

Thorium is so common that miners treat it as a nuisance, a radioactive by-product if they try to dig up rare earth metals. The US and Australia are full of the stuff. So are the granite rocks of Cornwall. You do not need much: all is potentially usable as fuel, compared to just 0.7pc for uranium.”

Published in: on August 30, 2010 at 4:00 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,

Founding Father Quote of the Day

“But as the plan of the [constitutional] convention aims only at a partial union or consolidation, the State governments would clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, EXCLUSIVELY delegated to the United States”

—- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 32, January 3, 1788

Can someone show me in the Constitution where it says that the Federal Government can take over industry, regulate CEO salaries, take over the Health Insurance Industry, and handicap the economy in the name of the “environment”? I don’t remember a clause for the Federalization of elementary education standards or for Federal regulation of transportation.

The Lie that is Global Warming

It has finally been exposed thanks to a hacker who hacked HAD_CRUT’s server and pulle doff 61 MB of emails over the past 10 years. They show a conerted effort on the part of top scientist to manipulate data and cover trails to make it appear that Global Warming exists and is human induced.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/

More commentary later on this wonderful revelation…

Published in: on November 20, 2009 at 10:20 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,

The World’s Fever Broken?

Al Snore famously said in his propoganda film “AN Inconvienent Truth” with the statement “The World has a fever.” According to the most recent reports, it looks like the Fever has broken.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/5525933/Crops-under-stress-as-temperatures-fall.html

Not only has global temperatures been falling for the past 11 years due to a quiet sunspot phase, but now it appears that crop production is beginning to suffer. Glaciers and ice are advancing as the temperatures get cooler and cooler each year.

If the Earth is cooling, why are we trying to cool it faster? Could it be because in truth, we have very little affect on global temperature and those who are trying to use “Climate Change” to forward their own Socialist political agenda?

Probably.

What are we Capitalist going to do to stop it?

Probably nothing.

Published in: on June 15, 2009 at 7:15 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

The Global Cooling Word Gets Out

Word is finally getting out even to the liberal media that the low sunspot activity will more than likely drive the global temperatures down.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090504-sun-global-cooling.html

This has alreayd been felt with the Earth cooling over the past 10 years, heavy snows, and frozen canals/rivers across Europe.

As Phil Valentine said: “It’s the Sun stupid!”

Published in: on May 5, 2009 at 9:38 pm  Comments (3)  
Tags: ,

Cutting CO2 Emissions May Speed up Global Warming

The British paper, The Telegraph, is reporting that studies show that increased pollution and carbon dioxide actually reduce the greenhouse effect in the given area.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/5202877/Global-warming-slowed-by-pollution.html

They predict that in the future, as we cut pollution that the greenhouse effect will increase.

So let me get this straight… cut pollution and CO2 emissions, and INCREASE GLOBAL WARMING. Do the environmental wackos know this? Doesn’t anyone else think this is big news because it runs counter to EVERYTHING the Al Gore crowd is telling us.

Published in: on April 22, 2009 at 9:31 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,

EPA Rules CO2 as Harmful to Humans

Today, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a report declaring that CO2 (among six other gases) are harmful to human health. This opens the door for regulation and oversight by the Obama Administration. Intrigued by the stupidity of this report, I decided to take a look at it.

On pages 46-47, they admit that they did not do any new research. Their findings are all a result of the same old IPCC report that came out and has been thoroughly disproven. They add in some additional old reports from the CCPA, but that is only to bolster the already given pre-approved result. This in short makes this report a fraud and is meant to do nothing less than to forward the Leftist Liberial agenda.

This report has been heralded in the New York Times to be the catalyst for creating new Green jobs. Yet they omit the fact that in doing so, it will destroy jobs and our economy which is already teetering on the brink.

In the EPA’s assessment on page 52, they show their bias by stating that the reason that they chose those 6 gases to evaluate was because they can only be emitted due to human involvement. This is patently false in the case of CO2 as the oceans and volcanoes emit CO2 on a regular and massive basis. (shown in quotes below)

As discussed above, carbon dioxide is the most
important greenhouse gas directly emitted by human
activities in terms of its total additional heating effect
being exerted on the climate.

Page 53:

Under all future
scenarios, carbon dioxide is projected to remain the
dominant driver of climate change for the remainder of this
century.

Kind of like how you guys predicted how the global temperature has been droppping for the past 10 years?

Historic data that go back many thousands of years
show that current atmospheric concentrations of the two
most important directly emitted, long-lived greenhouse
gases (carbon dioxide and methane) are well above the
natural range of atmospheric concentrations compared to the
last 650,000 years. Atmospheric greenhouse gas
concentrations have been increasing because human emissions
have been outpacing the ability of the natural environment
to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere over
timescales of decades to centuries.

Really? the report delibrately ignores the fact that at the time of the dinosaurs, CO2 levels were over 1000 ppm (compared to today’s 386 ppm). Also, how did they determine that the CO2 increase has been due to humans? So far, the report has not offered any evidence other than the psuedo-science of the IPCCC.

Now I see a contradiction in logic (no surprise there…):

On page 49:

The Administrator therefore
disagrees with commenters on the ANPR who argue that when
considering whether the atmospheric concentration of
greenhouse gases may reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health or welfare, she must consider the impact from
the regulation of greenhouse gases under the CAA following
an endangerment finding.

And then on page 57:

Future atmospheric greenhouse gas
concentrations—not only for the remainder of the current
century but indeed for decades and in some cases centuries
well beyond 2100—will be influenced by our present and
near-term greenhouse gas emissions. Consideration of
future plausible scenarios, and how our current greenhouse
gas emissions essentially commit present and future
generations to cope with an altered atmosphere and climate,
reinforces the Administrator’s judgment that it is
appropriate to define the combination of the six key
greenhouse gases as the air pollution.

So with these two quotes, the EPA is admitting that it is looking at the “worst case senario” and is not a realistic portrayal of future conditions. It is a joke and a shame.

On page 58:

The global average net effect of the increase in
atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, plus other human
activities (e.g., land use change and aerosol emissions),
on the global energy balance since 1750 has been one of
warming.

Did they not notice that in 1750, we were just coming out of the Little Ice Age? Of course we would be warming! In comparison to Roman times, we are actually cooler! Yup, gotta love that global warming cooling.

On page 59 we have an out and out lie:

Warming of the climate system is now unequivocal, as
is evident from observations of increases in global average
air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and
ice, and rising global average sea level.

We have been cooling for the past 10 years.

On pages 59 – 60:

Global observed temperatures over the last
century can be reproduced only when model simulations
include both natural and anthropogenic forcings, that is,
simulations that remove anthropogenic forcings are unable
to reproduce observed temperature changes. Thus, most of
the warming cannot be explained by natural variability,
such as variations in solar activity.

Kinda like how Mars had the same global temperature increase as Earth over the same period of time. How many humans are on Mars again?

I could go on, but I am getting sick of reading the Green Peace propganda…

Published in: on April 17, 2009 at 7:34 pm  Comments (3)  
Tags: , ,

The Myth of Human Caused Global Warming Exposed!

It looks like the truth is coming out about the myth of Human Caused Global Warming. It even appears that Al Gore’s pal at NASA’s GISS has been fudging the numbers in order to make up a case for it.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml

Shame shame!

Published in: on November 17, 2008 at 6:03 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: ,