House Democrats Chicken Out

It seems the House Democrats are scared to have Al Gore debate anyone on Climate Change (so called Global Warming).

Washington, DC — UK’s Lord Christopher Monckton, a former science advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, claimed House Democrats have refused to allow him to appear alongside former Vice President Al Gore at a high profile global warming hearing on Friday April 24, 2009 at 10am in Washington. Monckton told Climate Depot that the Democrats rescinded his scheduled joint appearance at the House Energy and Commerce hearing on Friday. Monckton said he was informed that he would not be allowed to testify alongside Gore when his plane landed from England Thursday afternoon.

Actually, come to think of it, Al Gore has never held a public debate with anyone on the other side. Is it because he knows that his story is bunk? He also knows that we have been COOLING for the past 7 1/2 years and this is due to the reduced energy output by the Sun.

Information like this kinda puts a damper on passing their Socialist Agenda… oops, I mean Cap and Trade Carbon plan.

Published in: on April 24, 2009 at 3:07 pm  Leave a Comment  

Liberal Wackos at UNC want to “Shut Down” Free Speech

This is a sample of the idiots at UNC who tried to shut down a debate on Illegal Immigration with Tom Tancredo and Virgil Goode. They smashed windows, set off fire alarms, and tried to shout down the speakers. Thankfully, Virgil Goode was able to finish his presentation despite these student’s best efforts.

I wonder if this guy has any original thoughts that he did not lift off a Liberal talking point sheet?

What gets me is that they claim to be “liberal”, “progressive”, and “thoughtful” yet they stiffle real debate and shut down thougthful discourse. “Progressives” such as these have become the evil which they claim to hate. They have become a means for the Liberal Agenda to fill the minds of our young people going to college for knowledge and not indoctrination.

Published in: on April 23, 2009 at 4:33 pm  Leave a Comment  

Cutting CO2 Emissions May Speed up Global Warming

The British paper, The Telegraph, is reporting that studies show that increased pollution and carbon dioxide actually reduce the greenhouse effect in the given area.

They predict that in the future, as we cut pollution that the greenhouse effect will increase.

So let me get this straight… cut pollution and CO2 emissions, and INCREASE GLOBAL WARMING. Do the environmental wackos know this? Doesn’t anyone else think this is big news because it runs counter to EVERYTHING the Al Gore crowd is telling us.

Published in: on April 22, 2009 at 9:31 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,

“President Obama Hates Black People”

“President Obama Hates Black People” (to work off the quote from Kanye West about Bush)

It appears Obama is now turning his back on his most ardent supporters, black farmers. He is denying them full access to this lawsuit that he supported with legislation when he was a Senator.

“You can’t blame it on the Bush administration anymore,” said John Boyd, head of the National Black Farmers Association, which has organized the lawsuits. “I can’t figure out for the life of me why the president wouldn’t want to implement a bill that he fought for as a U.S. senator.”

Published in: on April 22, 2009 at 8:55 pm  Comments (2)  

It pays to be married to Sen. Feinstein… literally.

So it seems that it pays to be married to Sen. Diane Feinstein. According to the Washington Times ( ) in the first session in Congress this year, Sen. Feinstein introduced a bill to funnel $25 billion to her husbands speculative realestate firm.

This is especially unusual since Sen. Feinstein is not on the committee who normally has jurisdiction in such matters. In addition, the agency is supposed to be funded by bank-paid insurance payments and not direct Federal dollars.

Quote from the Washington Times article:

Documents reviewed by The Washington Times show Mrs. Feinstein first offered Oct. 30 to help the FDIC secure money for its effort to stem the rise of home foreclosures. Her letter was sent just days before the agency determined that CB Richard Ellis Group (CBRE) – the commercial real estate firm that her husband Richard Blum heads as board chairman – had won the competitive bidding for a contract to sell foreclosed properties that FDIC had inherited from failed banks.

About the same time of the contract award, Mr. Blum’s private investment firm reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission that it and related affiliates had purchased more than 10 million new shares in CBRE. The shares were purchased for the going price of $3.77; CBRE’s stock closed Monday at $5.14.

Where is the outrage and the investigations? Oh wait, she is a California Democrat so that won’t happen anytime soon. Keep in mind that as I reported last Fall, Sen. Feinstein is also the one who stuck payoffs of pork to the TV/Film industry into the Bailout Bill.

You just gotta love the state that our government is in currently.

Published in: on April 22, 2009 at 3:30 pm  Leave a Comment  

Miss California Stands Firm,2933,517137,00.html

In the Miss USA pageant this past weekend, Miss California Carrie Prejean, was asked if she supported gay marriage by gay rights activist judge Perez Hilton. Her response was:

“We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite. And you know what, I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised.”

That was a perfectly fine and truthful answer. She did not give the judge what he wanted, a public and notable confirmation of his alternative lifestyle.

After the show, arguments erupted between supporters and detractors with the pro-gay rights people saying that she should not have gotten as high as runner-up. The Miss California organization came out in opposition to Miss Prejean and expressed dismay at her answer and support for gay rights.

What is this world coming to? Is the Thought Police going to begin enforcement of opinions? Does the Militant gay rights crowd want to force acceptance of their lifestyle.

I for one am in total support of Miss California and applaud her steadfast moral backbone.

Published in: on April 21, 2009 at 2:18 pm  Leave a Comment  

A picture says a 1,000 words…

Im so proud!!!

I'm so proud!!!

I think a picture says a thousand words don’t you? I think Obama has finally reached International Communist Superstar status now. Haha! I know Reagan is rolling over in his grave.

Published in: on April 20, 2009 at 7:34 pm  Comments (9)  

EPA Rules CO2 as Harmful to Humans

Today, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a report declaring that CO2 (among six other gases) are harmful to human health. This opens the door for regulation and oversight by the Obama Administration. Intrigued by the stupidity of this report, I decided to take a look at it.

On pages 46-47, they admit that they did not do any new research. Their findings are all a result of the same old IPCC report that came out and has been thoroughly disproven. They add in some additional old reports from the CCPA, but that is only to bolster the already given pre-approved result. This in short makes this report a fraud and is meant to do nothing less than to forward the Leftist Liberial agenda.

This report has been heralded in the New York Times to be the catalyst for creating new Green jobs. Yet they omit the fact that in doing so, it will destroy jobs and our economy which is already teetering on the brink.

In the EPA’s assessment on page 52, they show their bias by stating that the reason that they chose those 6 gases to evaluate was because they can only be emitted due to human involvement. This is patently false in the case of CO2 as the oceans and volcanoes emit CO2 on a regular and massive basis. (shown in quotes below)

As discussed above, carbon dioxide is the most
important greenhouse gas directly emitted by human
activities in terms of its total additional heating effect
being exerted on the climate.

Page 53:

Under all future
scenarios, carbon dioxide is projected to remain the
dominant driver of climate change for the remainder of this

Kind of like how you guys predicted how the global temperature has been droppping for the past 10 years?

Historic data that go back many thousands of years
show that current atmospheric concentrations of the two
most important directly emitted, long-lived greenhouse
gases (carbon dioxide and methane) are well above the
natural range of atmospheric concentrations compared to the
last 650,000 years. Atmospheric greenhouse gas
concentrations have been increasing because human emissions
have been outpacing the ability of the natural environment
to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere over
timescales of decades to centuries.

Really? the report delibrately ignores the fact that at the time of the dinosaurs, CO2 levels were over 1000 ppm (compared to today’s 386 ppm). Also, how did they determine that the CO2 increase has been due to humans? So far, the report has not offered any evidence other than the psuedo-science of the IPCCC.

Now I see a contradiction in logic (no surprise there…):

On page 49:

The Administrator therefore
disagrees with commenters on the ANPR who argue that when
considering whether the atmospheric concentration of
greenhouse gases may reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health or welfare, she must consider the impact from
the regulation of greenhouse gases under the CAA following
an endangerment finding.

And then on page 57:

Future atmospheric greenhouse gas
concentrations—not only for the remainder of the current
century but indeed for decades and in some cases centuries
well beyond 2100—will be influenced by our present and
near-term greenhouse gas emissions. Consideration of
future plausible scenarios, and how our current greenhouse
gas emissions essentially commit present and future
generations to cope with an altered atmosphere and climate,
reinforces the Administrator’s judgment that it is
appropriate to define the combination of the six key
greenhouse gases as the air pollution.

So with these two quotes, the EPA is admitting that it is looking at the “worst case senario” and is not a realistic portrayal of future conditions. It is a joke and a shame.

On page 58:

The global average net effect of the increase in
atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, plus other human
activities (e.g., land use change and aerosol emissions),
on the global energy balance since 1750 has been one of

Did they not notice that in 1750, we were just coming out of the Little Ice Age? Of course we would be warming! In comparison to Roman times, we are actually cooler! Yup, gotta love that global warming cooling.

On page 59 we have an out and out lie:

Warming of the climate system is now unequivocal, as
is evident from observations of increases in global average
air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and
ice, and rising global average sea level.

We have been cooling for the past 10 years.

On pages 59 – 60:

Global observed temperatures over the last
century can be reproduced only when model simulations
include both natural and anthropogenic forcings, that is,
simulations that remove anthropogenic forcings are unable
to reproduce observed temperature changes. Thus, most of
the warming cannot be explained by natural variability,
such as variations in solar activity.

Kinda like how Mars had the same global temperature increase as Earth over the same period of time. How many humans are on Mars again?

I could go on, but I am getting sick of reading the Green Peace propganda…

Published in: on April 17, 2009 at 7:34 pm  Comments (3)  
Tags: , ,

I’m Back!

After the election, I had to take some time off. Well due to popular demand and a need brought on by the crazy Obama Administration… I’m back.

First off, I was at a local Tea Party Tax Protest and it was wonderful! I hope this movement catches on because it was awsome to see everyone stand up for the country. As I said during the election, we are marching down the path of Socialism and now I can see it is true.

I can also see how biased the “mainstream media” is in this country against those who would stand up to defend it against Socialism. Socialism is against the beliefs of our Founding Fathers and against the American Dream. They (and we) believe that role of the American government is to provide for the common defense and to give the most opportunity to its people to grow and prosper. Socialism is about “fairness” and an attempt to make everyone equal. But in order to make everyone equal, you have to lower everyone to the lowest common denomentor. That is what Russia had and China still has. They also are seeing the downside to this and how it holds back the productive in favor of the non-productive.

Sound familar? It probably does since this is the expressed belief of the Obama Administration and his croonies in Congress (both Republican and Democrat).

As for media favoritism, I was at a rally which I (and others) estimated at 10,000. I did this by counting the people in the square plaza to be about 100 deep by 80 wide. This makes for a crowd of 8,000. Then there were between 1,000 and 2,000 across the street and on the side streets. The local media reported anywhere from 1,000 – 3,000. What rally were they at? What were they smoking? Then we have the hacks on CNN and MSNBC using the word “teabagging” in every degrogratory way possible. Where were the black jokes at the Million Man March or the gay jokes at the Gay Pride Parade? It’s shameful.

Published in: on April 16, 2009 at 6:57 pm  Comments (3)